Iran, US ceasefire over? Functionally yes. Contract broken. Needed - Force or talks.
- Ross
- 4 hours ago
- 2 min read
Heading into talks about forgotten parts of the memorandum.
America will continue to defend the Strait of Hormuz and Israel its sovereignty in its fight for peace against its surrounding enemies and especially important at this time, Lebanon.
This most recent flair-up greatly endangers the cease-fire agreement prolonging the talks between the US and Iran. If Iran's past is any indication of what they are going to do next we will see Iran dragging these talks out for as long as possible in hopes the US will lose its pitch, it's want for war. Remember a no war-resolution was just pasted in congress, even though mostly symbolic.
To Iran, talk is cheap but very desirable as to continue to keep a grip on its existence looking for a desirable off-ramp. Iran sees this as a phase that they must go through in the middle of a game saying we need more talks.
Israel
And now Israel and Lebanon are using talks and force, - and they're doing it at their own discretion lessening Iran's power and authority in Lebanon. This is considered by Iran a game changer and are willing to use military force to continue its grip within Lebanon. Iran won't be deterred, it's going to push for what it wants, even if that means the resumption of the fighting. Could this be another one of those tit-for-tat wars and again, back to talks.
US
Trump warned, the United States could finish the job using military force if Tehran continues violating the ceasefire. Force.
This conflict is nowhere nearing its end; we are only prolonging the inevitable with talks. The inevitable? the only language Iran really understands is force and has said willing to fight to the very end. The US Language? Military force, Israel’s solution? Go back to war, force. The solution an answer should be obvious.
Or will all this end by a Divine intervention. God willing. Psalm 83, Zachariah 12